There has been progress globally towards gender parity in education, but still only two in three countries have achieved gender parity at the primary level, one in two at the lower secondary level and one in four at the upper secondary level.
1.0 wealth parity index for upper secondary school completion
The desire to leave no one behind cuts across the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and is explicit in the fifth target in the education goal, SDG 4. This focus ensures that policy makers prioritise helping the furthest behind first.
To be able to monitor whether education gaps are being closed, we need data that is broken down by income, gender, age, race, ethnicity, migration status, disability, geographic location, and other characteristics relevant to national contexts, which household surveys provide.
Since 2010, the World Inequality Database on Education has been using household surveys to show how wide the education gaps are in different countries. This article summarizes some of the key facts and trends in inequality in education, while some additional aspects are discussed in the article on finance.
The graphs below look at the education gaps between groups, such as girls and boys, or the poorest and the richest. It measures that education gap with a parity index .
Although rarely appreciated, there has been a continuous move towards gender parity in the past generation. Girls and young women in many, mostly richer, parts of the world outnumber boys and young men in schools and universities.
Any line going below the grey shaded area shows that there are more boys or young men enrolled than girls.
In sub-Saharan Africa there are still only seven young women to every ten young men attending tertiary education.
Globally, there has been much progress since 2000 and there are now equal numbers of boys and girls in school. However, drilling down to the country level uncovers persistent gaps: just two in three countries have achieved parity in primary, one in two in lower secondary and one in four in upper secondary education.
The share of countries with a large disparity at the expense of girls has halved since 2000, but remains 7% in primary, 12% in lower secondary and 16% in upper secondary education.
We must not forget the boys when we talk about gender equality. While it is less common for countries to have a large disparity at the expense of boys in primary and lower secondary, it is far more common in upper secondary education and above, with the trend either stagnating or deteriorating.
In this graph, the greater and darker the blue part of the bar, the more countries there are with more boys out of school than girls. The greater and darker the green part of the bar, the more countries there are with more girls out of school than boys.
Overall, education gaps between girls and boys are not as wide as between those in rural and urban areas, and between the rich and the poor, which household surveys help reveal.
In Laos, for instance, while 96% of the richest attend primary education, only 28% of the poorest do. In Nigeria, while 94% of the richest attend lower secondary education, only 22% of the poorest do.
The red dots show what percentage of the poorest children or youth are attending education in comparison to the richest – shown in purple. You can change education level from primary to lower secondary education and above at the top of the chart.
In tertiary education, gaps are widest in middle-income countries. For example, in El Salvador, a low-income country, 51% of the richest but less than 2% of the poorest attended any form of post-secondary education.
In Mongolia, the respective shares were 70% and 10%.
It is even more revealing to look at the way gaps change as children go through their education.
Looking at gender gaps in Yemen below shows the extent to which girls drop out the higher the level of education.
Alternatively, selecting wealth shows how much gaps accumulate over the course of the education trajectory at the expense of the poorest, with barely any of them attending past upper secondary.
Rarely does a child fall into one single category, meaning that it is crucial to also look at the way that individual characteristics, such as gender, interact with others such as wealth as the next figure does.
In sub-Saharan Africa, the gaps between the poorest and richest grow over the course of the education trajectory, with fewer than 10 of the poorest girls, compared to 90 of the richest for every 100 boys attending tertiary education.
In Eastern and South-eastern Asia on the other hand, the dots are heading upwards from the grey line because gender gaps are at the expense of the poorest boys. By tertiary education level, the richest girls are only around a quarter more likely to attend than their male peers, but the poorest girls almost eight times as likely.
There are unacceptable levels of education inequality across countries and between groups within countries. High-quality disaggregated data is a pre-requisite to designing appropriate strategies to reduce these inequalities and ultimately leave no-one behind in our quest to achieve SDG 4.